اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 38 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,414 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,145 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 11,987,392 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,986,090 |
تأثیر لابی صهیونیستی (آیپک) بر سیاست خارجی آمریکا در قبال ایران با تأکید بر گفتمان تهدید | ||
| مطالعات راهبردی آمریکا | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 5، شماره 4، خرداد 1405، صفحه 98-121 | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/asr.2026.1308 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حجت حدیدی1؛ احمد زارعان* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مطالعات منطقهای- آمریکای شمالی، گروه مطالعات جهان، پژوهشکده مطالعات تمدنی شهید صدر(ره)، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین(ع)، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه مطالعات منطقهای، دانشکده و پژوهشکده مطالعات بین الملل، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 24 اردیبهشت 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 دی 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 01 خرداد 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| لابیها یکی از عوامل مؤثر بر سیاست داخلی و خارجی دولتها به شمار میروند و سعی میکنند با استفاده از ابزارها و به شیوههای مختلف، بر افراد و نهادهای تصمیمساز و تصمیمگیر تأثیر بگذارند تا منافع خود را تأمین کنند. یکی از مهمترین لابیهای تأثیر گذار در ایالات متحده آمریکا، لابی صهیونیستی است که در مسیر تأمین منافع رژیم صهیونیستی و صهیونیسم بینالملل تلاش میکند. با توجه به وجود شواهد غیر قابل انکار در مورد تأثیر لابی صهیونیستی بر سیاست خارجی آمریکا، این مقاله هدف خود را پاسخ به این سؤال تعیین کرده است که لابی صهیونیستی چگونه سیاست خارجی آمریکا را در قبال ایران در راستای منافع خود مدیریت و کنترل میکند؟ در این مقاله برای پاسخ به سوال تحقیق، دادهها با مراجعه به منابع کتابخانهای و برخط گردآوری شده و با استفاده از روش مطالعه اسنادی مبتنی بر رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی مورد بررسی و تحلیل قرار داده است. همچنین در این پژوهش از نظریه سازهانگاری به عنوان چارچوبی برای تحلیل یافتهها استفاده شده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان میدهد آیپک به عنوان مهمترین لابی صهیونیستی در آمریکا با روایتسازی و برسازی گفتمان تهدید در مورد سوژههایی مانند برنامه هستهای، موشکی و منطقهای ایران، این سوژهها را امنیتیسازی کرده و ضمن تحریک آمریکاییها، اقدامات ضدایرانی آمریکا را تشدید کرده است. خروج از برجام و کمپین فشار حداکثری نمونهای از سیاستهای خصمانه آمریکا علیه ایران تحت تأثیر لابی صهیونیستی است. بدیهی است عوامل متعددی بر سیاست خارجی آمریکا مؤثر است و لابی صهیونیستی یکی از این عوامل است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| لابی صهیونیستی؛ ایالات متحده آمریکا؛ سیاست خارجی؛ سازهانگاری؛ گفتمان تهدید؛ امنیتیسازی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Impact of the Zionist Lobby (AIPAC) on U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Iran, with Emphasis on the Discourse of Threat | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hojjat Hadidi1؛ Ahmad Zarean2 | ||
| 1M.A. Student in Regional Studies – North America, Department of World Studies, Shahid Sadr Institute of Civilizational Studies, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Corresponding author: Assistant Professor, Faculty of International Studies, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Lobby groups are regarded as among the influential factors in the domestic and foreign policies of governments, and they seek to influence decision-making individuals and institutions through various instruments and methods in order to secure their own interests. One of the most significant and influential lobbies in the United States is the Zionist lobby, which endeavors to advance the interests of the Zionist regime and international Zionism. Given the existence of undeniable evidence regarding the influence of the Zionist lobby on U.S. foreign policy, this article aims to answer the question of how the Zionist lobby manages and controls U.S. foreign policy toward Iran in line with its own interests. In order to answer the research question, data were collected through library and online sources and were examined and analyzed using the documentary study method based on a descriptive-analytical approach. In addition, constructivist theory is employed in this study as a framework for analyzing the findings. The results of the research indicate that AIPAC, as the most important Zionist lobby in the United States, has securitized such subjects as Iran’s nuclear, missile, and regional programs by constructing narratives and producing a discourse of threat around them; in doing so, it has stirred American opinion and intensified anti-Iranian measures undertaken by the United States. The withdrawal from the JCPOA and the maximum pressure campaign are examples of hostile U.S. policies against Iran influenced by the Zionist lobby. It is evident that multiple factors affect U.S. foreign policy, and the Zionist lobby is one of these factors. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Zionist lobby, United States of America, foreign policy, constructivism, discourse of threat, securitization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319–363. Ahouei, M.R. (2011). The role of the Israel lobby in United States foreign policy: From myth to reality. Afagh-e Amniyat Quarterly, 4(13). [In Persian] AIPAC. (2012). Letter to Congress on Iran’s Nuclear Program (Policy Conference Brief). AIPAC. (2014). Annual Policy Conference Highlights: Iran Nuclear Threat. AIPAC. (2015). Policy Conference Report: Iran’s Ballistic Missile Threat. AIPAC. (2016). Memo: The Dangers of the Iran Nuclear Deal. AIPAC. (2016). Policy Brief: Iran’s Cyber Threat. AIPAC. (2017). Policy Conference Report: Hezbollah’s Regional Role. AIPAC. (2017). Policy Conference Report: Iran’s Regional Threats. AIPAC. (2018). Letter to Members of Congress on Iran’s Chemical Weapons Capabilities. AIPAC. (2018). Letter to Members of Congress on Iran’s September 2017 Missile Tests. AIPAC. (2018). Letter to Members of Congress on Iran’s Support for Proxy Forces. AIPAC. (2018). Letter to Members of Congress on Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces. AIPAC. (2018). Policy Brief: A Path Forward after the Iran Deal. AIPAC. (2019). Briefing Book: U.S.-Israel Relations and Middle East Policy. AIPAC. (2019). Policy Brief: The Houthi Threat in Yemen. AIPAC. (2020). Policy Brief: Palestinian Resistance Axis. AIPAC. (2021). Policy Conference Report: Iran’s Maritime Threats. AIPAC. (2023). U.S. Security Assistance to Israel. AIPAC. (2024). Policy Agenda. Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201. Barda, K. (2020). AIPAC’s grassroots path to Congress: How Isaiah Kenen built AIPAC to be a powerhouse. Bar-Dea Ltd. Ben-Ephraim, S. (2024). The Israel lobby and relations between the American Jewish Community and Israel. In A. Siniver (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, pp. 433–448 Broder, J. (2015). How the Iran Nuclear Deal Weakened AIPAC, Washington’s Most Powerful Interest Group. Newsweek. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Carter, J. (2006). Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. Simon & Schuster. Checkel, J. T. (1998). The constructive turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324-348 Clawson, P. (2020). The Iranian Missile Threat: Addressing the Growing Challenge. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Clinton, H. (2016). Read Hillary Clinton’s Speech to AIPAC. Time. Cordesman, A. H. (2020). Maritime Conflict in the Persian Gulf. Center for Naval Analyses. Dehghani Firoozabadi, S.J., & Alavi, S.M. (2016). Search the securitization of the nuclear activities of the Islamic Republic of Iran by the pro-Israel lobby in America from the perspective of the Copenhagen School. Political Strategic Studies, 5(17), 39-59. doi: 10.22054/qpss.2016.4347. [In Persian] Friedman, G. (2006). The next 100 years: A forecast for the 21st century. Doubleday. Golafshan,A and faizee,C . (2023). The impact of soft power of the Israeli lobby on the foreign policy of the United States of America towards Iran (a comparative study of the Obama and Trump presidency). Soft power Studies, 13(3), 67-91. [In Persian] Gultom, Y.S.M., & Miftah, H.Z. (2024). The role of the Jewish lobby toward US foreign policy making on the 2023 Israel-Palestine war (Case of AIPAC). Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies (HJSIS), 2(2), 38–49. [https://doi.org/10.20956/hjsis.v2i2.34405](https://doi.org/10.20956/hjsis.v2i2.34405) Hadian, N. (2003). Constructivism: From international relations to foreign policy. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 17(4). [In Persian] Hansen, L. (2006). Security as practice: Discourse analysis and the Bosnian War. Routledge. Hayden, P. (2013). Constructing threats and security: The role of the public and the media. Routledge. Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. Javanshiri,A S and Bbasiri,M A . (2019). Comparing the role of Israel lobby in US foreign policy during Barack Obama and Donald Trump administrations (With an emphasis on nuclear agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran). International Studies Journal (ISJ), 16(1), 31-61. doi: 10.22034/isj.2019.93717. [In Persian] Katzman, K. (2019). Iran’s Cyber Activities: Assessment and U.S. Policy (CRS Report No. R45465). Congressional Research Service. Katzman, K. (2020). Iran’s Support for Terrorism and Its Regional Proxies (CRS Report No. R44017). Congressional Research Service. Katzman, K. (2021). Iran sanctions (CRS Report No. RS20871). Congressional Research Service. [https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/RS20871](https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/RS20871) Kenen, I.L. (1981). Israel's defense line: Her friends in Washington. Prometheus Books. Khalil, T.H., & Mahmood, H.S. (2023). The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and Its Impact on the US Presidential Election 2020. Tikrit Journal for Political Science, 2(32), 251–274. Khorshidi, M., & Hosseini, S. M. (2022). The role of the Jewish lobby in U.S. foreign policy decisions in support of Israel. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Political Studies of the Islamic World, 11(4). [In Persian] Küçük, Ö.N. (2025). Funding in the Shadow of Conflict: AIPAC’s Financial Influence on US Congress Post-2023 Israel-Hamas War. Türkiye Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Middle Eastern Studies), 12(1), 1–20. [https://doi.org/10.26513/tocd.1574363](https://doi.org/10.26513/tocd.1574363) Landler, M. (2018, May 8). Trump Abandons Iran Nuclear Deal He Long Scorned. The New York Times. Luneburg, W.V., Susman, T.M., & Mansfield, R. (Eds.). (2009). The lobbying manual: A complete guide to federal lobbying law and practice (4th ed.). American Bar Association. Mearsheimer, J.J., & Walt, S.M. (2007). The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Mearsheimer, J.J., & Walt, S.M. (2015). The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy (F. Ardizadi, Trans.). Tehran: Center for the Islamic Revolution Documents Publishing Institute. (Original work published 2007). [In Persian] Nephew, R. (2017). The Art of Sanctions: A View from the Field. Columbia University Press. Parsi, T. (2017). Losing an Enemy: Obama, Iran, and the Triumph of Diplomacy. Yale University Press. Pollack, K. M. (2014). The Persian Puzzle: The Conflict Between Iran and America. Random House. Pollack, K.M. (2015). The Missile and the Man: Iran’s WMD Programs. Random House. Reagan, R. (1990). An American Life. Simon & Schuster. Richelson, J. (2004). Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction (National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 80). Rossinow, D. (2018). “The edge of the abyss”: The origins of the Israel lobby, 1949–1954. Modern American History, 1(1), 23–43. Rynhold, J. (2021). Divide and rule: Discursive authority, identity dissonance, ethnic lobbies, and US foreign policy, or how President Obama defeated AIPAC over the 2015 Iran deal. Foreign Policy Analysis, 17(2), orab005. [https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab005](https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab005) Shepherd, L. J. (2008). Gender, violence and security: Discourse as practice. Zed Books. Simbar,R and Nazari,K . (2014). A Survey of AIPAC and its Influence on the United States of America’s Middle East Policy. International Relations Researches, 4(11), 9-34. [In Persian] Sterling-Folker, J. (2000). Competing paradigms or birds of a feather? Constructivism and neoliberal institutionalism compared. International Studies Quarterly, 44(1), 97-119. Trump, D. (2016). Donald Trump's AIPAC Speech Gets Subdued Response. Time. U.S. Department of State. (2017). U.S. Announces New Iran-related Sanctions. Waltz, K. (2003). Man, the state, and war: A theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. Zehfuss, M. (2002). Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 66 |
||