News

 Statistics

Number of Journals38
Number of Issues1,409
Number of Articles10,094
Article View11,919,871
PDF Download6,966,893
emamian, S. (2023). Investigating the strategies of Iran and Turkey in the Syrian crisis using game theory. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 32(124), 129-149.
sohiel emamian. "Investigating the strategies of Iran and Turkey in the Syrian crisis using game theory". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 32, 124, 2023, 129-149.
emamian, S. (2023). 'Investigating the strategies of Iran and Turkey in the Syrian crisis using game theory', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 32(124), pp. 129-149.
emamian, S. Investigating the strategies of Iran and Turkey in the Syrian crisis using game theory. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2023; 32(124): 129-149.

Investigating the strategies of Iran and Turkey in the Syrian crisis using game theory

سیاست دفاعی
Volume 32, Issue 124 - Serial Number 3, November 2023, Pages 129-149    PDF (603.63 K)
Document Type: Original Article
Author
sohiel emamian*
عضو هیت علمی
Receive Date: 17 April 2022,  Revise Date: 13 June 2022,  Accept Date: 31 December 2023 
Abstract
In the contemporary world, the developments in the Middle East are among the most extensive and profound developments in the political structure of the countries in the region. Syria, as one of the countries in the region, which has been going on for several years. Iran and Turkey, as two regional countries, have been involved in this crisis from the beginning and are trying to control Syria with the aim of changing the political map and balance of power in the Middle East. Efforts to do this have led them to unprecedented competition based on ideological and identity variables. Turkey and Iran are among the regional actors that have taken an active approach to these developments in their own interests. The Syrian crisis has revealed the clash of strategic interests between Turkey and Iran. The two countries are pursuing opposing policies in the Syrian crisis. This article examines the causal relationship between the regional strategies of Turkey and Iran as an independent variable and the contradictory policies of the two countries in the Syrian crisis as a dependent variable. The purpose of this study is to obtain the role of the regions of Turkey and Iran by considering the conflicting policies of these two countries using game theory in the Syrian crisis. In this article, using modeling game theory (zero-sum game), the necessary analysis of strategies and policies implemented by two countries that have conflicting goals in Syria has been examined.
Keywords
Syrian Crisis; the Middle East; Game Theoretical Analysis; Nash Equilibrium
References
احمدی پور و همکاران (1۳۹۸). " واکاوی رقابت ایران و ترکیه در بحران سوریه  "  فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلتیک  ، شماره ۵۵، دوره ۱۵.

بلوچیان و همکاران (1۳۹7). " اهمیت رویکرد نظریه بازی در مدل سازی "  فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی فرماندهی و کنترل ، شماره 1، دوره 2.

شریفیان و همکاران (1۳۹۱). " تعامل و تقابل ایران و ترکیه در بحران سوریه "  نشریه علمی امنیت پژوهی ، شماره ۳۸، دوره ۱۱.

شهبازی و همکاران (1398)" تأثیر روابط ایران و ترکیه بر روند همگرایی در خاورمیانه" فصلنامه پژوهش‌های سیاسی جهان اسلام، سال نهم، شماره اول، بهار ،1398صص165-189

غائبی محمد رضا  (1۳۹5). " اقتصاد سیاسی روابط ایران و ترکیه در دوره حکومت حزب عدالت و توسعه"  فصلنامه سیاست خارجی ، شماره 2، دوره 30.

Altunışık, Meliha Benli (2010). “Turkey’s Changing Middle East Policy”. UNISCI Discussion Papers (23): 149-162

Çağatay, Soner (2018). “Turkish-Iranian Rivalry Redux”. The Washington Institute. http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/turkish-iranian-rivalry-redux

Çetinsaya, Gökhan (2003). “Essential Friends and Natural Enemies: The Historic Roots of Turkish Iranian Relations”. Middle East Review of International Affairs 7 (3): 116-132.

Demiryol, Tolga (2013). “The Limits to Cooperation Between Rivals: Turkish-Iranian Relations Since 2002”. Ortadoğu Etüdleri 3 (2): 111-144.

Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt (2002). “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View”. Handbook of International Relations. Eds. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE Publications.

Güner, Serdar (2003). “Oyun Kuramı ve Uluslararası Politika”. METU Studies in Development 30 (2): 163-180

Jenkins, Gareth H. (2012). “Occasional Allies, Enduring Rivals: Turkey’s Relations with Iran”. Silk Road Paper.

Kurki, Milja and Colin Wight (2010). “International Relations and Social Science”. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Eds. Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Keskin, Arif (2009). “İran-Türkiye İlişkilerine Genel Bir Bakış”. 21. Yüzyıl Dergisi 12: 45-54.

Kardaş, Şaban (2012). “Turkey’s Syria Policy: The Challenge of Coalition Building”. The German Marshall Fund on Turkey Series.

Larrabee, F. Stephen and Alireza Nader (2013). “Turkey-Iranian Relations in a Changing Middle East”. RAND Cooperation Research Report Series.

McCurdy, Daphne (2008). “Turkish-Iranian Relations: When Opposites Attract”. Turkish Policy Quarterly 7 (2): 87-106.

Miş, Nebi. “Suriye 2007”. Ortadoğu Yıllığı 2007. Eds. Kemal İnat, Muhittin Ataman ve Murat Yeşiltaş. İstanbul: KüreYay.

Pappalardo, Massimo (2008). “Multiobjective Optimization: A Brief Overview”. Pareto Optimality, Game Theory and Equilibria. Eds. Altannar Chinchuluun et al. New York: Springer Science-Business Media.

Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (2006). “Game Theory Approaches”. Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Ed. Jennifer Sterling-Folker London: Lynne Eienner Publishers.

Sandıklı, Atilla ve Ali Semin (2014). “Bütün Boyutlarıyla Suriye Krizi ve Türkiye”. Ortadoğu’da Değişim ve Türkiye. Eds. Atilla Sandıklı ve Erderm Kaya. İstanbul: Bilgesam Yay.

Turocy, Theodore L. and Bernhard von Stengel (2001). “Game Theory”. CDAM Research Report LSE- CDAM- 2001-09

Statistics
Article View: 435
PDF Download: 395