News
Statistics
| Number of Journals | 38 |
| Number of Issues | 1,409 |
| Number of Articles | 10,094 |
| Article View | 11,919,871 |
| PDF Download | 6,966,894 |
Implementation and Assessment of Jammer Effect on FMCW Tracking Radar Ability Based on a New Criterion | ||
| رادار | ||
| Article 9, Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 21, December 2019, Pages 103-116 PDF (1.78 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| Authors | ||
| M. R. zakerhaghighi1; M. mivehchy* 1; A. ZeidAbadi nezhad2 | ||
| 1Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,Isfahan University of Technology , Isfahan, Iran | ||
| Receive Date: 12 May 2019, Revise Date: 01 October 2019, Accept Date: 27 November 2019 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The effect of jammers on radars has been assessed on the basis of detection range reduction whereas in a tracking radar, inducing inconsistency in target tracking ability is more important than range reduction. A new criterion known as relative radar functionality destruction time is introduced and defined as the ratio of functionality destruction time of the radar to one period of the jammer, in which the power of the jammer signal and target echo power are considered. In this article first, the jammer effect coefficient is defined as the relative destruction time in terms of jammer to signal power ratio. Next, this criterion is applied in assessing a simple conical scan radar receiver against a conventional jammer (sweep noise jamming). By implementing the structure of a FMCW tracking radar, a simple target based on the DRFM method and one type of jamming against this radar are simultaneously simulated, and the functionality destruction is extracted for different radar parameters. Simulation results demonstrate that this new criterion outperforms its counterparts. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Relative Functionality Destruction Time; Jamming Performance; FMCW Tracking Radar | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] Z. Ying, Q. Gao, and Z. Wang, “Modeling of jamming destroy factor,” In 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), vol. 1, pp. 198-201, 2011.## [2] Y. Zhu, Z. Wang, Q. Gao, and M. Jia, “An Effects Evaluation Method for Angle Deception Jamming,” in 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering (ICISE), pp. 4708-4711, 2009.## [3] D. C. Schleher, “Electronic warfare in the information age,” Artech House, 1999.## [4] D. K. Barton, “Radar system analysis and modeling,” Artech House 2004.## [5] G. R. Curry, “Radar system performance modeling,” Artech House Norwood, 2005.## [6] S. Sadeghi and A. Sheikhi, “Jamming Noise Suppression Using Discrete Polynomial-Phase Transform in Pulsed Radars (In Persian),” Journal of “Radar”, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53-66, 2017.## [7] E. K. Reedy, “Radar ECCM Considerations and Techniques,” In Principles of Modern Radar: Springer, pp. 681-699, 1987.## [8] S. Mighani, M. Mivehchy, and M. F. Sabahi, “Evaluating sweep noisy barrage jamming effect on tracking radar based on functioning destruction time,” In 7th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST), pp. 400-404, 2014.## [9] C. Liu, R. Wu, Z. He, X. Zhao, H. Li, and P. Wang, “Modeling and Analyzing Electromagnetic Interference Signal in Complex Battlefield Environments,” In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems, pp. 351-361, 2016.## [10] N. A. Zarei, M. M. Nayebi, A. R. Amin, M. R. Danaei, and H. Aalami, “Discrimination of the Target and Chaff in Multi-dimensional Space (In Persian),” Journal of “Radar”, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1-10, 2018.## [11] F. Lotfi, M. Bighash, and A. Sheikhi, “Using Multiple Auxiliary Antennas for Sidelobe Blanking to Counter Deception Jamming in Search Radars,” Journal of “Radar”, vol. 5, 2017.## | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,178 PDF Download: 973 |
||