News

 Statistics

Number of Journals38
Number of Issues1,418
Number of Articles10,203
Article View12,182,977
PDF Download7,127,264
niyazi, M., miri, S., farhadian, A. (2019). Development of a Model for Spouse Selection Criteria in Iran. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 14(48), 121-144.
mohsen niyazi; somayeh miri; ali farhadian. "Development of a Model for Spouse Selection Criteria in Iran". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 14, 48, 2019, 121-144.
niyazi, M., miri, S., farhadian, A. (2019). 'Development of a Model for Spouse Selection Criteria in Iran', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 14(48), pp. 121-144.
niyazi, M., miri, S., farhadian, A. Development of a Model for Spouse Selection Criteria in Iran. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2019; 14(48): 121-144.

Development of a Model for Spouse Selection Criteria in Iran

فصلنامه فرهنگی- تربیتی زنان و خانواده
Article 5, Volume 14, Issue 48, November 2019, Pages 121-144    PDF (1018.09 K)
Document Type: Original Article
Authors
mohsen niyazi1; somayeh miri* 2; ali farhadian3
1Full Professor of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kashan
2Corresponding Author: Ph.D. Candidate of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kashan
3Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Management and Entrepreneurship
Receive Date: 06 June 2019,  Revise Date: 23 July 2019,  Accept Date: 27 August 2019 
Abstract
Every person has a set of criteria in mind when choosing a spouse, and it seems that such criteria are different among boys and girls. In this regard, choosing a spouse as the primary cornerstone of family formation is highly important. For this reason, it is necessary to study marriage and spouse selection criteria nowadays. This study aims at investigating the criteria for spouse selection in Iran. The method used in this study is meta-synthesis, which as one of the most efficient research methods makes it possible to structurally utilize the findings extracted from qualitative studies related to the subject under study to attain comprehensive and interpretive findings. For this reason, the results of the previous studies were analyzed, and the required data were collected from the years 1386 to 1396 and 2001 to 2018. Out of 122 articles, 45 articles were selected for analysis. The results of the study, based on the review of numerous articles and the criteria for spouse selection, resulted in 72 codes. Based on the frequency of the criteria, the following can be mentioned as the most important ones: decency, chastity, moral characteristics, education, faith and belief, good appearance and physical features, sufficient income, appropriate occupation, cultural fit of families, age and commitment for childbearing. By examining and integrating the initial findings and after moving between sub-domains, eight main areas of spouse selection were obtained: religious criteria, family criteria, economic criteria, physical and sexual criteria, socio-cultural criteria, personal criteria, psychological criteria and moral criteria.
Keywords
model development; marriage; spouse selection criteria
References
Badahdah, A. M., & Tiemann, K. A. (2009). Religion and Mate Selection through Cyberspace: A Case Study of Preferences among Muslims. [doi: 10.1080/13602000902726798]. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 29(1).

Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., & Blanco-Villasenor, A., et al. (1990). International Preferences in Selecting Mates: A Study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 21.

Buss, D.(2007). THE Evolution of Human Mating. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 502-512.

Campbell, Anne (2002). The Evolutionary Psychology of Women, New York, Oxford University Press

Clarke, Victoria; Braun, Virginia (2006): Successful qualitative research. A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

Dabuis, M. H. (2010).Importance difference criteria for meta selection in single and married. journal of marriage and the family, 67.

Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispo- sitions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408-423.

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Matthews, J. (2007). Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. Personal Relationships, 14: 149 - 166.

Greenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., & Santos, C. (2014). Marry your like: Assortative mating and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 104(5): 1 - 15.

Malhotra, A. A. Tsui, V., & de, S. (1992). Mothers, Daughters and Marriage:  marriage. Family Perspective, 22.

Newman . B& Newman. F. (2007). Development through life (sixth edition). Pacific grove, CA: Brooks/cok.

Noorania,Mojtaba, Refahib, Zhaleh * comparison of the spouse selection criteria and emotional, maturity between men and women. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174 ( 2015 ) 2234 – 2239

O'Neil, D. (2006). Sex and Marriage: An Introduction to The Cultural Rules Regulating Sexual Access and Marriage; Overview: Part I. California.

OECD (2012). OECD Employment Outlook 2012. Retrieved from Paris: ⟨http://www.oecdilibrary. org/employment/oecd-employment-outlook-2012_empl_outlook-2012-en⟩.

Raymond, F. & I. Sheena, K. Emir, S. Itamar (2006). "Gender Differences in Mate Selection", The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

Sandelowski, M.; Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthessizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer.

Schwarz, S., & Hasbrouck, M. (2012). Sex and age differences in mate- selection preferences. Human Nature, 23, (4).

Sepehria Safoora, Bagherian Fatemeh ،Generation and gender differences in mate selection. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 84 ( 2013 ) 10 – 12.

Sharma, N. V., & Sumati, A. Kesar.(2005). Intergenerational differences in the concept of Marriage among Dogra Brahmin females (mothers and daughters). Anthropologist, 7(4).

Shoemaker, E, G. (2007). Human mate selection theory: An integrated evolutionary and social approach. Journal of Scientific Psychology. www.psyencelab.com

Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19.

Strassberg, D. S., & English, B. L. (2015). An experimental study of men’s and women’s personal ads. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8).

Sullivan, K.T. (2001). "Understanding the Relationship between Religiosity and Marriage", J fam Psychol , 15(4), P.610-626.

Thomas David r. (2003), A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis, university of Auckland, new Zealand

Todosijevic, B., Ljubinković, S. & Arančić, A. (2003). Mate selection criteria: A trait desirability assessment study of sex differences in Serbia. Evolutionary Psychology, 1.

Vegard Skirbekka,b,⁎, Melissa Hardyc, Bjørn Heine Strandd Women’s spousal choices and a man’s handshake: Evidence from a Norwegian study of cohort differences , 2018. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ssmph

Wardle, L. D. (2011). The boundaries of belonging: Allegiance, purpose and the definition of marriage, BYU, Journal of Public Law, 25(2), 287-315.

Zaki Wahhaj, An economic model of early marriage. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 152, August 2018, Pages 147-176

Zimmer L. (2006) "Qualitative meta‐synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3).

Statistics
Article View: 1,367
PDF Download: 997